STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS 2006 - democrats' DESPICABLE ACT OF DEFIANCE, ARROGANCE AND SCORN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY TAX PAYERS IS AN INSULT FOR ALL AMERICANS.
DEMOCRATS, IT IS NOT PRESIDENT BUSH WHO WANTS SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM SO BAD, IT IS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO DEMANDS SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM AS SHOWN IN THE POLL BELOW, TAKEN BY A REPUTABLE NEWS ORGANIZATION IN MARCH 2005:
Most Americans do not understand the real meaning of the word " S A V I N G " when democrats say they are "saving" social security. What they really are saying is that they are "saving social security" just as we save Christmas ornaments year after year for future use. Democrats "save" social security election after election to buy votes.
During the State of the Union Address on Tuesday, January 31, 2006, the President reminded members of the Congress that his request for social security reform was not addressed yet, and the democrat members jumbed to their feet in jubilation as if they have just won the world series.
These are the biggest L I E R S in the country because every time they say social security is the greatest invention since penicillin, they are lying through their teeth and they know they are telling a lie.
Whenever a politician, democrat or republican, utter "social security trust fund" he/she is L Y I N G, because social security is a tax on one generation to support the previous generation. No money is "invested" anywhere, it is just spent away.
Last year these lying politicians collected 130 billion dollars more than what was needed to pay the current retires AND THEY LAVISHLY SPENT all that money, to buy votes and stay in power.
They are L Y I N G, again, when they say "BUSH WANTS TO PRIVATIZE SOCIAL SECURITY." What they don't say is that it is the American taxpayers that want at least a portion - 2 or 3% of the current 13% social security tax - to be invested in secure stocks and bonds, just as the government and other employees do.
Social Security is a pyramid scheme and the primary reason for the survival of democrats as a political party. They do not have any faith in it as a retirement source and that is why they created separate, secure retirement system for themselves and their buddies in the bureaucacy.
Since its inception several reforms and tax increases took place, but social security will be in serious trouble in ten years.
Social Security Reform is a top priority for 100 million American workers in the private sector. For many Americans, social security is the only "pension" they are counting on, and we cannot allow the politicians to use it as secure vehicle for re-election. At least 3% of the current social security tax collection should be set aside for real investment which, in long term, would yield twice the current social security "repayment" which is based on future tax collection.
The proposed plan assures continuity of payments to current retires and those above 50 years of age when they retire. This gives time for those under 50 years to have an alternative source for retirement without becoming homeless.
If any politician refuse to reform social security with a portion of the tax invested in stocks and bonds in individual accounts, he/she must be defeated, so that our children would not be crushed under the weight of unfunded mandates.
The Blogtrotter - SS taxpayer
February 1, 2006 11.17 p.m. EST
DEMOCRATS, IT IS NOT PRESIDENT BUSH WHO WANTS SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM SO BAD, IT IS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO DEMANDS SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM AS SHOWN IN THE POLL BELOW, TAKEN BY A REPUTABLE NEWS ORGANIZATION IN MARCH 2005:
Most Americans do not understand the real meaning of the word " S A V I N G " when democrats say they are "saving" social security. What they really are saying is that they are "saving social security" just as we save Christmas ornaments year after year for future use. Democrats "save" social security election after election to buy votes.During the State of the Union Address on Tuesday, January 31, 2006, the President reminded members of the Congress that his request for social security reform was not addressed yet, and the democrat members jumbed to their feet in jubilation as if they have just won the world series.
These are the biggest L I E R S in the country because every time they say social security is the greatest invention since penicillin, they are lying through their teeth and they know they are telling a lie.
Whenever a politician, democrat or republican, utter "social security trust fund" he/she is L Y I N G, because social security is a tax on one generation to support the previous generation. No money is "invested" anywhere, it is just spent away.
Last year these lying politicians collected 130 billion dollars more than what was needed to pay the current retires AND THEY LAVISHLY SPENT all that money, to buy votes and stay in power.
They are L Y I N G, again, when they say "BUSH WANTS TO PRIVATIZE SOCIAL SECURITY." What they don't say is that it is the American taxpayers that want at least a portion - 2 or 3% of the current 13% social security tax - to be invested in secure stocks and bonds, just as the government and other employees do.
Social Security is a pyramid scheme and the primary reason for the survival of democrats as a political party. They do not have any faith in it as a retirement source and that is why they created separate, secure retirement system for themselves and their buddies in the bureaucacy.
Since its inception several reforms and tax increases took place, but social security will be in serious trouble in ten years.
Social Security Reform is a top priority for 100 million American workers in the private sector. For many Americans, social security is the only "pension" they are counting on, and we cannot allow the politicians to use it as secure vehicle for re-election. At least 3% of the current social security tax collection should be set aside for real investment which, in long term, would yield twice the current social security "repayment" which is based on future tax collection.
The proposed plan assures continuity of payments to current retires and those above 50 years of age when they retire. This gives time for those under 50 years to have an alternative source for retirement without becoming homeless.
If any politician refuse to reform social security with a portion of the tax invested in stocks and bonds in individual accounts, he/she must be defeated, so that our children would not be crushed under the weight of unfunded mandates.
The Blogtrotter - SS taxpayer
February 1, 2006 11.17 p.m. EST
posted by The Blogtrotter at 6:49 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home